The book offers a modern, feminist retelling of an epic tale, but it may not appeal to all readers due to specific stylistic choices and narrative deviations. The narrative employs a sophisticated vocabulary, which some readers find makes for an uncomfortable and disjointed reading experience. However, this same characteristic makes it a valuable read for younger learners seeking to expand their vocabulary.The romanized spelling choices for certain traditional terms are a notable point of contention. For example, using "Radnyi" instead of "Rani" may be confusing for readers familiar with the original terminology, as the 'd' letter can significantly alter the pronunciation and meaning.
The novel takes significant liberties with established mythology, which may frustrate those seeking a more traditional interpretation. Specific plot points, such as Ravan's connection to Kaikeyi, Sita's lineage, and the characterization of Rama, diverge considerably from the source material. While it is a work of fiction, these deviations can be seen as "rubbish" by some readers who feel the story has moved too far from its mythological roots.
Ultimately, the book is a divisive read. Many feel it is a less-than-average novel that can easily be skipped without missing out on anything significant.
***
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7175604900
